 |
Price |
City, State |
Property Type |
Beds/Baths |
Sq.Ft. |
Miles |
|
$439,000 |
Dracut, MA |
Single Family |
5/3 |
15000 |
16.6 |
|
$318,000 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Single Family |
3/1 |
1248 |
16.6 |
|
$259,900 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Condo/Townhome |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$295,000 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Condo/Townhome |
2/2 |
1300 |
16.6 |
|
$439,000 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2075 |
16.6 |
|
$398,700 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$289,900 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Condo/Townhome |
3/2 |
1700 |
16.6 |
|
$459,900 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Single Family |
3/1 |
1800 |
16.6 |
|
$399,000 |
Chelmsford, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
1700 |
16.6 |
|
$379,500 |
Billerica, MA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1600 |
16.6 |
|
$435,900 |
Billerica, MA |
Single Family |
4/1 |
2200 |
16.6 |
|
$274,000 |
Billerica, MA |
Single Family |
2/2 |
1354 |
16.6 |
|
$589,000 |
Wayland, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$639,000 |
Sudbury, MA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
2500 |
16.6 |
|
$839,900 |
Sudbury, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$685,500 |
Sudbury, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$599,900 |
Sudbury, MA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
2200 |
16.6 |
|
$459,000 |
Stow, MA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1779 |
16.6 |
|
$869,000 |
Natick, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$715,000 |
Natick, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
3400 |
16.6 |
|
$459,900 |
Natick, MA |
Condo/Townhome |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$729,000 |
Natick, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$675,000 |
Natick, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2430 |
16.6 |
|
$664,900 |
Natick, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2240 |
16.6 |
|
$409,900 |
Maynard, MA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$339,000 |
Marlborough, MA |
Single Family |
3/3 |
1325 |
16.6 |
|
$315,000 |
Marlborough, MA |
Condo/Townhome |
0/0 |
0 |
16.6 |
|
$415,000 |
Marlborough, MA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
2548 |
16.6 |
|
$669,900 |
Marlborough, MA |
Single Family |
5/3 |
3050 |
16.6 |
|
$624,900 |
Marlborough, MA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
3250 |
16.6 |
|
NOTE: Click a column header once and you get ascending sorting, click again and you get descending sorting. |