 |
Price |
City, State |
Property Type |
Beds/Baths |
Sq.Ft. |
Miles |
|
$439,000 |
Lathrop, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.6 |
|
$475,000 |
Lathrop, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.6 |
|
$503,360 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
6/3 |
2999 |
33.7 |
|
$325,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
2/1 |
831 |
33.8 |
|
$450,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$599,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$695,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$599,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$525,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$510,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$495,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$525,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
33.8 |
|
$465,000 |
Manteca, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1600 |
33.8 |
|
$511,900 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
5/3 |
2680 |
35.5 |
|
$410,000 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1667 |
35.5 |
|
$489,000 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1897 |
35.5 |
|
$429,000 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1654 |
35.5 |
|
$544,950 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
4/3 |
2781 |
35.5 |
|
$369,000 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1277 |
35.5 |
|
$735,900 |
Sacramento, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
2675 |
35.5 |
|
$615,000 |
Mather, CA |
Single Family |
4/3 |
2989 |
35.9 |
|
$515,000 |
Mather, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2268 |
35.9 |
|
$424,995 |
Mather, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1803 |
35.9 |
|
$230,000 |
La Grange, CA |
Acreage/Land |
0/0 |
0 |
36.8 |
|
$368,000 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
37.3 |
|
$340,000 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
37.3 |
|
$664,629 |
Gold River, CA |
Single Family |
5/3 |
3137 |
37.3 |
|
$299,950 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Condo/Townhome |
0/0 |
0 |
37.3 |
|
$385,000 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
37.3 |
|
$329,000 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
37.3 |
|
NOTE: Click a column header once and you get ascending sorting, click again and you get descending sorting. |