 |
Price |
City, State |
Property Type |
Beds/Baths |
Sq.Ft. |
Miles |
|
$379,000 |
Diamond Springs, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1400 |
25.8 |
|
$389,000 |
Diamond Springs, CA |
Single Family |
2/1 |
1000 |
25.8 |
|
$539,500 |
Soulsbyville, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
26.3 |
|
$525,000 |
Pollock Pines, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2000 |
27.6 |
|
$365,000 |
Pollock Pines, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
27.6 |
|
$920,000 |
Pollock Pines, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
27.6 |
|
$325,000 |
Pollock Pines, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
27.6 |
|
$449,999 |
Camino, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1544 |
27.9 |
|
$380,000 |
Camino, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1450 |
27.9 |
|
$499,000 |
Tuolumne, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.0 |
|
$377,500 |
Placerville, CA |
Single Family |
2/1 |
1104 |
29.9 |
|
$600,000 |
Placerville, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.9 |
|
$615,000 |
Placerville, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.9 |
|
$359,000 |
Placerville, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1250 |
29.9 |
|
$490,000 |
Placerville, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.9 |
|
$485,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
4/3 |
2800 |
30.7 |
|
$675,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Farm/Ranch |
3/2 |
1930 |
30.7 |
|
$375,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1300 |
30.7 |
|
$152,500 |
Oakdale, CA |
Mobile Home |
3/2 |
1344 |
30.7 |
|
$405,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
30.7 |
|
$665,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
30.7 |
|
$275,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
30.7 |
|
$388,900 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1637 |
30.7 |
|
$795,000 |
Oakdale, CA |
Farm/Ranch |
2/2 |
15000 |
30.7 |
|
$549,900 |
Oakdale, CA |
Single Family |
5/3 |
2847 |
30.7 |
|
$479,000 |
Groveland, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
38.5 |
|
$349,000 |
Groveland, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
38.5 |
|
$649,500 |
Groveland, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
38.5 |
|
$499,900 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1992 |
43.0 |
|
$414,000 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
43.0 |
|
NOTE: Click a column header once and you get ascending sorting, click again and you get descending sorting. |