 |
Price |
City, State |
Property Type |
Beds/Baths |
Sq.Ft. |
Miles |
|
$499,950 |
Rancho Murieta, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
25.6 |
|
$899,000 |
Rancho Murieta, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
25.6 |
|
$685,000 |
Rancho Murieta, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
25.6 |
|
$499,900 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1992 |
26.7 |
|
$414,000 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
26.7 |
|
$499,000 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2394 |
26.7 |
|
$398,000 |
Escalon, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
1335 |
26.7 |
|
$799,950 |
Wilton, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2200 |
27.0 |
|
$338,000 |
Lodi, CA |
Condo/Townhome |
3/2 |
1400 |
29.1 |
|
$409,900 |
Galt, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.3 |
|
$409,900 |
Galt, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.3 |
|
$719,000 |
Galt, CA |
Single Family |
3/2 |
2300 |
29.3 |
|
$570,000 |
Galt, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2333 |
29.3 |
|
$450,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
3/3 |
2065 |
29.7 |
|
$500,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Acreage/Land |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$379,990 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$415,990 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$397,950 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
1801 |
29.7 |
|
$295,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$260,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
2/1 |
884 |
29.7 |
|
$275,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$125,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Acreage/Land |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$121,000 |
Stockton, CA |
Acreage/Land |
0/0 |
0 |
29.7 |
|
$503,360 |
Rancho Cordova, CA |
Single Family |
6/3 |
2999 |
31.5 |
|
$735,000 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
4/2 |
2162 |
31.6 |
|
$989,900 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
4/3 |
3067 |
31.6 |
|
$699,950 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
31.6 |
|
$619,500 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
31.6 |
|
$599,950 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
31.6 |
|
$449,000 |
El Dorado Hills, CA |
Single Family |
0/0 |
0 |
31.6 |
|
NOTE: Click a column header once and you get ascending sorting, click again and you get descending sorting. |